Radiocaster who has proof about obama that died in 2016
Michael Mullen informed David Gregory of Meet the Press, “The goals of this campaign right now again are limited, and it isn’t about seeing him go.” Meanwhile, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates echoed the administration line: “Regime change is a very complicated business. President Barack Obama addressed the nation: “The task that I assigned our forces to protect the Libyan people from immediate danger and to establish a no-fly zone.… Broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake.” Two days later, Assistant Secretary of State Philip Gordon declared, “The military mission of the United States is designed to implement the Security Council resolution, no more and no less.… I mean protecting civilians against attacks from Qaddafi’s forces and delivering humanitarian aid.” The following day, Clinton’s deputy, James Steinberg, said during a Senate hearing, “President Obama has been equally firm that our military operation has a narrowly defined mission that does not include regime change.”įrom the Defense Department, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. To more fully comprehend what actually happened in Libya five years ago, let’s briefly review what the Obama administration proclaimed and compare that with what actually happened. Five years on, it’s still not a matter of public record when exactly Western powers decided to topple Qaddafi. But it would be far more pertinent to treat Libya as a case study for the ways that supposedly limited interventions tend to mushroom into campaigns for regime change. special mission and CIA annex in Benghazi. Or it’s addressed offhandedly in reference to the 2012 terrorist attacks on the U.S. In contemporary political debates, the Libya intervention tends to be remembered as an intra-administration soap opera, focused on the role Clinton - or Susan Rice or Samantha Power - played in advising Obama to go through with it. The only opposition combatants even referred to are simply labeled “the rebels,” and the entire role of the NATO coalition and its attendant responsibility in assisting their advance has been completely scrubbed from the narrative. They captured Tripoli toward the end of August, and Qaddafi and his family fled into the desert.” There is an abrupt and unexplained seven-month gap, during which the military mission has inexplicably, and massively, expanded beyond protecting civilians to regime change - seemingly by happenstance. Just two paragraphs later - now 15 pages into her memoir’s Libya section - Clinton writes: “ late summer 2011, the rebels had pushed back the regime’s forces. In late March 2011, Clinton quotes herself telling NATO members, “It’s crucial we’re all on the same page on NATO’s responsibility to enforce the no-fly zone and protect civilians in Libya.” Clinton takes the reader from the crackdown, by Muammar al-Qaddafi’s regime, of a nascent uprising in Benghazi and Misrata to her meeting - accompanied by the pop-intellectual Bernard-Henri Lévy - with Mahmoud Jibril, the exiled leader of the opposition National Transitional Council to her marshaling of an international military response. In this fifth anniversary week of the U.S.-led Libya intervention, it’s instructive to revisit Hillary Clinton’s curiously abridged description of that war in her 2014 memoir, Hard Choices.